Replace Traditional Web Application Firewall (WAF) With New Age WAF
Our application security is no longer optional to our business. Security breaches in web applications can cost millions of rupees.
Security breaches in web applications can cost millions of rupees. Web applications have become the primary target of attackers because of the potential for monetization. Domain Name System(DNS) related outages and the distribution of DDoS Attacks lead to a negative business impact. The preventive measures that we can use from this area of attacks are the Web Application Firewall.
A Web Application Firewall (WAF) protects the application layer and is designed to analyze each HTTP / S request in the application layer. It can detect and block anything malicious if found. It can prevent attacks exploiting a web application's known vulnerabilities, such as SQL injection, Cross-site Scripting (XSS), file inclusion, and improper system configuration.
A web application firewall's primary function is to establish a strict border to prevent certain malicious traffic types from gaining resources.
Since the late eighties, WAFs have been available, and this early generation technology is not compatible with recent modern cyberattacks. Because of that, they are unable to offer full application control and visibility. With the increasing security vulnerabilities, the New Age web application firewall is the only solution that can provide proper protection.
Web applications were scarce, and so were web threats. Finding boat attacks was complicated and straightforward. Cybersecurity requirements were shallow and could be dealt with by essential cybersecurity management.
From now onwards, everything has changed. Web applications can live in an on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environment. Customers and employees have access to them through the web from anywhere. Because of that, the firewall can't be easy to track what is going on where the IP addresses are constantly changing, and CDN is obscure, requests came and going.
WAFs must be protected from a variety of challenging and complex threats. Traditional WAFs are implemented as hardware devices, which are difficult to use and suffer from poor visibility and poor performance. To an extent, 90% of organizations claim that their WAFs are too complicated.
WAFs must be protected from a variety of challenging and complex threats. Traditional WAFs are implemented as hardware devices, which are difficult to use and experience poor visibility and poor performance. To an extent, 90% of organizations claim that their WAFs are too complicated.
Ponmon's study states that only 40% of respondents are satisfied with the current WAF, which means that they are not using it to its full potential. Few companies have admitted that they use WAF only to generate security alerts instead of blocking suspicious activity.
Organizations are burning into the WAF and regret that they have invested so much money in making any progress in protecting what is important to them. This is where the need for a new age web application firewall comes into play.
Here are some of the challenges with Traditional WAF
We often hear that industry members have moved from the traditional web application firewall to the next General WAF, prompting them to switch. Most of the reasons represent a variation of the following:
1.Lack of Scalability
An organization's requirements for network scaling exacerbate some of the challenges, such as cost, time, and complexity. Deploying and maintaining equipment clusters becomes more complex.
DevOps and Agile methodologies require constant rearrangement and re-tuning of clusters that interfere with the security team's resources.
Web application standards are constantly evolving, increasing the need to provide WAFs.
The growing adoption of JSON payloads and HTTP/2 has left most web application firewall vendors battling to keep up. While the market expects constant innovation, many WAF providers are growing progressively fragile.
While WAFs effectively monitor web traffic to prevent HTTP-specific attacks, they are unable to prevent zero-day attacks. WAFs are designed to detect pre-configured patterns - Zero-day damage can be applied to any risk vectors detected by pre-configured rules.
4.Blocking Legitimate Traffic
Another dissatisfaction with most WAF users is the careless blocking of valid traffic, also known as false positives. While this may seem relatively harmless in terms of security, it can be devastating to organizations. This may prevent visitors from taking advantage of the app's functionality, uploading media or purchasing products.
One possible way to meet this challenge is to implement the lowest number of patterns, but this makes the network even more vulnerable. Most WAF solutions find it difficult to balance performance. Unless you have the resources to do so, it's hard to get traditional WAF value. This is the biggest gap, because the traditional WAF has failed to keep its promise.
5. DDoS Attacks
A Distributed Daily-Off-Service (DDS) attack usually occurs when multiple systems fill the targeted system's bandwidth or resources, distributing one or more web servers.
Most importantly, Diodes' difficulties cause WAF installation problems. We found that a significant number of organizations use WAFs to prevent DDoS attacks. The main reason they claim is that WAFs can be upgraded to mitigate DDoS attacks. However, the problem is that traditional WAFs are not installed to deal with large-scale DDoS attacks. Moreover, today's applications share/provide third-party platforms that cannot be protected with a layer of protection. Without cloud-based WAF, it is difficult to plan capacity in advance, and even if you do, it will have a high limit.
Cloud WAF, and specially managed cloud WAF, solves this problem to scale up and down. The business must pay only on a value basis, with no fixed costs in advance for future or non-future possibilities.
Understanding the Capabilities of New Age WAF
In the early days, web applications were scarce, and so were web threats. Finding Melevolant boats was complicated and straightforward. Cybersecurity requirements were very low and could be dealt with by basic cybersecurity management.
Today everything has changed. Web applications can live in an on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environment. Customers and employees have access to them through the web from anywhere. Likewise, the firewall cannot track what is happening, where the requests are, and where they are going because the IP addresses are constantly changing, and the CDN is obscured.
While many WAF providers claim to offer the next generation, most of them use security models similar to traditional WAFs, so this is not NextGen. We need a new era of WAF, which is becoming the next GEN.
The cloud-based WAF addresses the attacks that most web applications experience and offers permanent enhancements that threaten visibility and analysis. In traditional WAFs, enterprises fly blindly, expecting everything to be "fine" until something goes wrong.
Newer-age firewalls understand that even valid sites can cause damage without even knowing it and have links to malware sites and malicious payloads. A business sometimes wants to give access to a social media platform that contains malicious links or files.
This cloud-based security platform influences its international deployments and maintains complete insight into global traffic trends. It monitors and analyses the traffic of all global deployments. When a security threat is detected in one place, all deployments worldwide are updated and cracked down on.
We can conclude that there are important differences between traditional and modern WAF. If traditional WAF is inadequate for any reason, we could compromise your web application. It is a good idea to choose advanced web protection that does not adversely affect your business operations. New Age Cloud-based WAF is built to provide adequate web protection and value for money.